Posted: Friday, November 6, 2009 10:45 am | Updated: 10:36 am, Fri Nov 6, 2009.
By EMILY DUPUIS / Sun Staff Writer | 3 comments
WESTERLY - After more than three months of formal negotiations, the School Committee plans to vote Monday on a new two-year teachers' contract.
A tentative agreement has been reached between negotiating teams representing the school board and Westerly Teachers' Association (WTA), and now the full board and union membership must each vote to ratify the pacts.
The school board is scheduled to meet at 6:30 p.m. in the Westerly High School media center to discuss and ratify what Chairman James Murano Jr. described as a tentative agreement.
Contract details are expected to be made public that night.
"We plan on going through it item by item in open session," Murano said of the agreement on the table.
It's not known if the roughly 300-member teachers' union has voted to ratify the pact or has scheduled a meeting to do so.
WTA President Donna Allinson and Jerome Egan, an assistant executive director of the National Education Association of Rhode Island and WTA negotiating team member, did not return calls to comment Thursday.
Westerly teachers have been working without a new contract since the previous three-year pact expired on Aug. 31.
One member of the school board's Contract Negotiations Subcommittee, Louis Sposato, has publicly claimed that the contract is too expensive.
"Westerly cannot afford this contract at this time," he wrote, adding the fault lies with the school board's negotiation team.
Sposato, an independent who is not running for re-election, said the school board and WTA's negotiations teams met Tuesday and approved a tentative two-year agreement that will cost the district more than $156,128 over two years (he did not reveal the exact cost). That meeting, its attendees unknown, was not posted publicly with the Secretary of State's office.
The WTA turned down three earlier offers from the subcommittee - packages that would have cost the district between $112,434 and $156,128 more over two years, he wrote.
Sposato added the contract negates recent district sacrifices including decisions to close Tower Street School, move fifth-grade students to the middle school and lay off 29 teachers in fiscal 2009. And it will mean cutting or scaling back programs, he wrote.
On Thursday, Murano said he was aware of Sposato's letter but wanted to reserve comment until he had a chance to read it in full.
"There are two other members of the School Committee on the negotiations subcommittee and we both supported it," he said of the tentative agreement.
Mary Raftery also represented the School Committee in the negotiations, along with the superintendent, assistant superintendent, director of finance and administration, Schools Solicitor William Nardone and Providence labor attorney Daniel Kinder.
Teams representing the two parties have been holding formal, closed-door negotiations since July 20 and a Department of Labor and Training-appointed mediator has been participating in the talks since August. At a standstill, the parties had been scheduled Wednesday to enter interest arbitration, where a panel of three arbitrators would hear each side's proposal and determine what to put in the contract.
Monetary decisions, however, are not binding.
While contract details have not been made public, the pact was expected to address a recent directive by the state education commissioner calling for school districts to eliminate seniority-based assignments. Westerly teacher assignments have largely been based on seniority.
And while the school board entered negotiations saying this fiscal year's $49.37-million school budget does not include money for teacher pay raises, Sposato's letter indicates the new contract does include new salary and benefit costs.
The board headed into negotiations calling for teachers to pay more toward their health and dental coverage, support a restructured health insurance plan and agree to a new teacher evaluation system.
Posted in News, Local on Friday, November 6, 2009 10:45 am Updated: 10:36 am. | Tags: Wta, Contract Negotiations, Sposato
Thewesterlysun.com presents a sampling of today's top stories and special online-only features. To read the complete edition of The Westerly Sun, you must be an E-Paper or print subscriber.
Click here to subscribe or log-in to The Westerly Sun E-Paper.
Current users sign in here.
If you do not have an account, set one up!
It's easy to do and it's free!
TalkBack is an opportunity for viewers to exchange comments regarding online content. Please keep your comments on-topic and free of personal attacks, foul language, advertisements, impersonations, etc. Comments are moderated. Please allow time for posting. Comments are not edited. They are either approved or not. TalkBack comments are the thoughts and opinions of visitors and do no represent the values or politics of Sun Publishing Company or The Westerly Sun.
www.thewesterlysun.com
The Westerly Sun
Phone number: 401-348-1000
Address: 56 Main Street
Westerly, RI 02891
© Copyright 2009, The Westerly Sun, Westerly, RI. Powered by Blox CMS.
12roxy
THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE: No more teacher compensation increases, until they fall to a level in comparison to other districts in the state, that is acceptable to the taxpayers of Westerly, no matter long it takes.
WHY should the taxpayers of Westerly be paying their teachers the highest compensation levels in the state?
The teacher-compensation blunders of past school committees should not be considered uncorrectable today.
Teachers should be thankful that they've been enriched years in advance of their due. Demanding more compensation when they are the highest paid in the state is just bold-faced GREED.
NO MORE TEACHER COMPENSATION INCREASES UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE!!!
12roxy
Hmmmmm..... the Nov. 5, 2009 article on the Chamber's calendar has been archived already????? Now that's not the way to keep your website numbers up!
12roxy
Surprise ~ Surprise ~ Surprise! The "helpful" school committee's gave away the candy store in the previous years and decades, so why is it unpopular to take the candy store back now???